<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pokemon and Typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845</link>
	<description>The class blog of AVT 395-1, George Mason University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpatino2</title>
		<link>http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845&#038;cpage=1#comment-2309</link>
		<dc:creator>kpatino2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 02:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845#comment-2309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am also a fan of this typographic style, but I think this is a very lazy version of it. The perspective is kind of off and there are a lot of gaps in place as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also a fan of this typographic style, but I think this is a very lazy version of it. The perspective is kind of off and there are a lot of gaps in place as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akeeton</title>
		<link>http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845&#038;cpage=1#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>akeeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845#comment-2307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a big fan of typographic layouts like this, but i think this one has some weak points. A lot of the type is too small. If they played with the placement better, they wouldn&#039;t have had to rely on changing the sizes so drastically. Also, there are a number of empty spaces that could have been filled more effectively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of typographic layouts like this, but i think this one has some weak points. A lot of the type is too small. If they played with the placement better, they wouldn&#8217;t have had to rely on changing the sizes so drastically. Also, there are a number of empty spaces that could have been filled more effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angechilada</title>
		<link>http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845&#038;cpage=1#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>angechilada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writingfordesigners.com/?p=4845#comment-2300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think these style of word clouds can be interesting, but I don&#039;t know if I necessarily like the way they laid the type out. It&#039;s a great concept, though!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these style of word clouds can be interesting, but I don&#8217;t know if I necessarily like the way they laid the type out. It&#8217;s a great concept, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
