Skip to content

Periodic Table Of Typefaces

It’s a curse of a designer to be obnoxiously aware of type. We see papyrus used on a product and refuse to bye it. We go out to lunch with our friends and say things like “did you see the sign treatment for the restrooms? I mean really.” We will be thrown into disarray over our font choices and what they’re saying to the viewer. Or maybe that’s just me. I hope it’s not just me.

Anyways, once I was taking with a friend and I pointed out a typeface that i though was being used exceptionally well. His reply was, “I don’t envy you designers, memorizing typefaces, it’s like learning 50 periodic tables.” Well I laughed a little because I had stumbled across this poster a while ago the “Periodic Table of Typefaces: Popular, Influential, & Notorious”. It’s laid out just like a periodic table, except instead of elements, there are typefaces, instead if an atomic number they have a raking, instead of the atomic weight they have the creator, and to be honest I don’t know what else is included on a periodic table, but this one also includes the type family, class, and the year created. Perhaps we should hand there out to students to learn instead!Periodic Table of Typefaces

You can view the full-sized image here : http://editorial.designtaxi.com/news-periodictypeface2902/1.jpg

3 Comments

  1. I definitely do the same thing! When I first saw this periodic table I went through every single one and tried to guess what is was going to be.

    Monday, November 26, 2012 at 10:26 pm | Permalink
  2. nmonton001 wrote:

    I NEED THIS. (haha) I get a kick out of stuff like this. I think we can all agree after taking Don Starr’s typography class that we are all aware of the difference between “typefaces” and “fonts.”

    Friday, November 30, 2012 at 8:41 pm | Permalink
  3. Drew_Garvey wrote:

    Whats interesting to me about this is design a font family is actually very scientific. There is a lot of math involved and its a very tedious process much like science is.

    Wednesday, December 5, 2012 at 9:58 pm | Permalink