Skip to content

Criticism for the sack of criticism

I am not sure if anyone else has ever felt that during a critic or just reading so sort of review found it bash for things that seem less important or even giving off a vibe that person is just being negative. A few times I felt that we have a habit of being negative for academic purposes or use it as a proof that we are intelligent. After the break I stumbled on this video, it is geared more towards video games, but I feel that criticism concern is consistence. Adam goes on saying that “criticism doesn’t mean being critical… that you look more intelligent and more negative you are.” I not saying that all negative criticism falls under this idea, but I do feel I myself and others would use negative aspects just sound more professional in our trade. What are your thought?